Archive for March 18th, 2009

A Christian Survivalist Gun List, Handguns, part 1

Posted on March 18, 2009. Filed under: The Christian Survivalist |

As a Christian and as a citizen, not a subject, of the United States I believe and am convicted that it is my right and my duty to defend my family, my self, my home, and other innocent people around me who may be defenseless against those evil people who would perpetrate a heinous crime.

I am convinced that the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution is not about duck hunting, it is about defending freedom from tyrants. Therefore, I am well armed and well trained as is my entire family. Sadly it is looking like we may be getting closer to the day when we have to defend ourselves against not just criminals, but tyrants. It is an easy step from the current socialist government to a tyranny.

I realize that there are many Christians who are as convicted about being a pacifist as I am about convicted about self-defense. I believe this MAY be a matter of conscience. The pacifists might have the liberty under scripture to be personally pacifistic. And certainly in matters of personal honor, embarrassment or minor infractions we should “turn the other cheek”. We should not be “quick to anger” let alone quick to shoot anybody. Very often the best defense is a timely retreat to safety rather than a costly confrontation over pride. But when it comes to defending the innocent? To fail to act when you have the means to act would be a sin. And to fail to provide yourself the equipment and training to act when it is available, may also be a sin.

People often throw out, “Well I can’t see Jesus carrying a gun! He wouldn’t shoot anybody and he let the police take him away and suffered wrong and died. Therefore we should too! So there!”

First of all Jesus came to die for sinners. That was his purpose and that is why he told Peter to put away his sword and then healed the man’s ear that Peter cut off. Jesus went like a lamb to the slaughter, because that was his mission. But that same Jesus met Joshua on the road to Jericho as the Commander of the LORD’s Army carrying a sword. That same Jesus is coming again to judge this old world and to separate the sheep from the goats. That same Jesus will ultimately cast all who oppose him into the Lake of Fire and the SecondDeath.

Secondly, have you ever asked why Jesus allowed his disciples to carry swords in the first place? We know that at least two disciples had concealed carry licenses from Luke 22:38, 49-50; John 18:10 tells us that it was Peter who struck Malchus and cut off his ear (hint: he wasn’t aiming for the ear).

Thirdly, you cannot read through the OT without knowing that God commanded Israel to conquer Canaan with the sword, and that God used men like Gideon and Samson who bore the sword, or David (a man after God’s own heart) who slew “10,000’s of the Philistines”. The Israelite Army, and most armies in those days, were more like a citizen’s militia and the soldiers supplied their own arms. And in the book of Esther you have God’s people about to be attacked by Jew haters and God delivers them by a pagan king, Xerxes, who authorized them to arm and defend themselves. A Jewish militia defended the innocent. Then there is one of my favorite books, Nehemiah, where godly men used a sword and trowel to rebuild Jerusalem’s walls while armed to defend against the aggressive Jew haters.

The principle of self defense is clearly taught throughout the Bible, it makes good common sense in the practical, evil world we all live in, and the pacifists can enjoy their pacifism only so long as better men than they are willing to stand on a cold, windy wall at night, armed and ready to sacrifice their lives so that others may live.

All that being said, what kind of guns should we have for self-defense purposes, especially in a TEOTWAWKI event (The End Of The World As We Know It). And the way the finacial collapse is going, and the way the N.Koreans and Iranians are acting, we may be facing this kind of situation sooner rather than later. What would the Chicoms do if Amerika went bankrupt and defaulted on all those bonds we have sold the Chicoms? Hmmmm…is it possible?

Here is a list of handguns that I can recommend for a Christian Survivalist:

I. The basic training and equipment

1. Go to a gun range or gun store and take a gun training and safety course first of all. I was raised around guns, went hunting by myself the first time when I was 7 years old. My grandmother put a .410 shotgun in my hands and sent me out to shoot a turkey. Her only words of caution were, “Don’t let the javelina get you!” In the Army I was an Infantryman and shot everything from a 105 mm howitzer to a 20mm vulcan, to a 4.2″ mortar as well as machine guns, grenade launchers, assault rifles, and pistols. I have been armed security for over 20 years. The point is that I have a lot of experience but still consider the basics of handgun safety and instruction important. Don’t just go buy a gun in the current panic. Take a class first!

2. Go to the gun range again, and rent a couple of different handguns in different calibers and test them out. Shoot a revolver in .38 cal. and then a semi-auto pistol in 9mm to see which is right for you.

3. Once you settle on a type of gun, revolver or pistol, and settle on caliber, then you should look at the different makers. In revolvers you can’t go wrong with Smith&Wesson, Ruger or Taurus. In semi-auto pistols you have an even wider variety with Smith&Wesson, Springfield, Ruger, TAurus, Glock, Sig, Colt, Beretta, H&K, etc. Rent and test a gun before you purchase, especially at today’s prices!

4. You can’t just buy a gun, you also have to buy a holster or two that fits your gun. If you are gong to carry concealed, you need to get 2-3 different kinds of holsters for your different styles of dress. Ranging from a purse designed to carry a concealed weapon (my wife has one) to a fanny pack, to an inside the pants holster, or even a shoulder rig, you need to think through your wardrobe and have a way to carry your handgun.

5. And don’t forget the cleaning equipment to maintain your firearm.

6. If you are going to shoot regularly, and you should, you will need some range supplies like a range bag or gun case, protective shooting glasses and ear protection.

7. Finally, you need trigger locks and or a gunsafe to lock up your firearms, especially if you have small children.

II. Self-defense Handguns

A. Revolvers- I love revolvers and carried a S&W mod.66 on duty for many years, so I am a bit partial. For their simplicity they are wonderful, but for some ladies, their trigger pull might be a problem. The first gun I bought for my wife was Taurus CH85 in .38 but the trigger pull was just too strong for her comfort. So I had to keep it for myself  (darn the luck!) and get her a Sig P230. I still carry a S&W mod.66 loaded with .357 when I hog hunt.

1. I highly recommend that everyone have at least one good, small revolver as a personal defense weapon. A little snub nosed .38 like my Taurus CH85 can be carried in a boot holster, in a purse, in a pant pocket, or notebook. I can shoot mine accurately out to about 7 meters, but most of these guns are good only for about 3 meters (yards).

Power ratings for the .38 special:

110 grain jhp from Winchester has a muzzle velocity of 945 fps with 218 foot pounds of energy.

2. Very few people carry a full sized revolver as their primary self-defense gun anymore, even though they are reliable, accurate, and effective. I still recommend fellow survivalists have at least one full sized revovler on hand. My choice is the S&W mod.66 in .38/.357mag. I have a 6″ barrel so it is not that practical for concealed carry, but makes a very good car gun (in Texas we are allowed to carry in our vehicles without a Concealed Carry License.) I carry my .357 when I am hunting. The .357mag has more power than a 9mm and I can darn well shoot it better than any of my semi-autos. Some folks go for a bigger caliber like the .44mag. I hope to get one some day.

3. Though not a self-defense handgun another revolver you ought to consider is a .22 LR. I have a Ruger Single-Six that has a 5 1/2″ barrel and two cylinders: 22LR and 22WMR. This is a single action western style revolver that is a great handgun to learn on (this is the first gun my wife ever shot) and a lot of fun with not much cost to the ammo.

www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/FAFamily?type=Revolver&subtype=Single%20Action&famlst=14

4. To conclude the revolver needs: I recommend the survivalist have no less than 3 revolvers- a .38 snub nose, a full sized .357 or .44mag, and a full sized .22LR.

II. Semi-Auto Pistols- what the semi-auto pistols give you is more firepower in a more compact package with easier reloading ability and less recoil than the revolvers. You have more diversity in calibers of bullets and more diversity in manufacturers. Semi-autos dominate the handgun market and are in fact the better choice for a self defense handgun for most people.

1. The very small pistols are easier to conceal than are the small revolvers. We own 2 fine pistols in .380ACP caliber but both are on the large side of the caliber. My wife’s gun of choice is a Sig P-230. This gun can easily fit in her concealed carry purse or inside the waistband of a pair of pants. But it is still larger than several of the other .380’s available. The Taurus PT-58 that I own is likely the largest .380 ever built. I bought it in 1993-4 prior to the Clinton gun ban and high capacity magazine ban. This large .380 can carry 12 in the mag plus 1 in the chamber. But I love this pistol and is my favorite concealed carry pistol. Even though it is large, I can still stick it in my waistband. A lot of gun writers are very critical of the lack of power in a .380 but I believe accuracy is more important and at 7 meters I can put two quick shots in the center of chest and a third between the eyes. I don’t need a .45 for that.

www.securityarms.com/20010315/galleryfiles/2400/2402.htm

Here is the current Taurus .380

www.taurususa.com/products/product-details.cfm?id=33&category=Pistol

Ruger’s new LCP .380 ACP is one of the best new smaller .380’s on the market.

www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/FAFamily?type=Pistol&subtype=Centerfire%20Autoloading&famlst=64

I am a big Ruger fan, owning 4 of their guns, and wanting more! Sig has upgraded their P-230 into the new P-232

www.sigsauer.com/Products/ShowCatalogProduct.aspx?categoryid=10

Walther makes excellent small pistols in .32ACP as well as .380ACP

www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=13152&storeId=10002&categoryId=43802&langId=-1&parent_category_rn=43326&top_category=43326&training=

Here are some facts about the power of the .380 ACP

90 grain jhp +P 1050 feet per second at the muzzle with 220 foot pounds of energy from Cor Bon.

102 grain jhp 940 fps at the muzzle and 200 lbs of energy at muzzle from Remington

2. The 9mm Lugar or Parabellum is likely the most popular pistol in America now. With more power than a .38 and in +P almost as much power as a .357mag, the 9mm can come in a large frame like my Ruger P-89

www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/FAProdResults?function=famid&famid=3&variation=P89&bct=Yes&type=Pistol

or in a very small, easily concealable frame like the Taurus Millenium Pro 111

www.taurususa.com/products/product-details.cfm?id=23&category=Pistol

I can certainly recommend the various Sig pistols in 9mm as I carried one on duty for a few years, the P228 which, like all my other guns (it seems) has been discontinued.

www.sigsauer.com/Products/ShowCatalogProductDetails.aspx?categoryid=7&productid=78

One company I was with issued us Glock 19’s in 9mm and this became my favorite. Though I do not own one, I really fell in love with the Glock and highly recommend it and hope to own a Glock or two someday.

www.glock.com/english/index_pistols.htm

For the Christian Survivalist the 9mm is a great choice due to the large number of choices it gives and the abundance of ammunition available. It is very flexible being able to be concealed in a small gun or, in a full sized gun loaded with +P ammo, it can be an excellent duty gun or self-defense gun in a TEOTWAWKI situation.

More to follow…

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 9 so far )

F-22 Cuts Coming, Obama Disarming, Russia Rearming

Posted on March 18, 2009. Filed under: News of the Day |

Check out these headlines, one right on top of the other, at the Drudge Report:

Pentagon readies big cuts in weapons...

Medvedev announces plan to rearm Russia...

And is anybody surprised that a leftard leftist radical is going to make deep cuts in the military budget? This is what Amerika voted for! Anybody who voted for Obamasky and did not think he would make deep cuts in the military was asleep or just too ignorant to be qualified to vote.

What kinds of cuts in the military can we expect? The first thing you need to know, to be perfectly fair, is that this plan to cut weapons R&D and acquisition started under Pres. Bush with Robert Gates as Defense Secretary. Because of the costs of the War and because of a shift in thinking away from a major war with a superpower like Russia to a series of lesser, low tech wars, like Afghanistan, the Bush administration was already thinking about cutting back on the big ticket items like fighter planes, new tanks and artillery, new aircraft carriers. This Republicrat idea goes back to SecDef Rumsfield who thought you could fight war on the cheap and sent in a minimal force to Iraq instead of following the Powell doctrine of overwhelming force. This move led to the collapse of authority in Iraq, since we did not have enough boots on the ground, and this led to the insurrection. It was Rumsfield who cancelled the Army’s new artillery program.

But even prior to that, it was Dick Cheney serving in the George HW Bush administration as SecDef who cut the AX program to develop a new Navy/USMC stealth attack jet. Here we are 20 years later and no stealth attack aircraft for the Navy.

Now enter Obamasky. First on the chopping block is the USAF F-22 Raptor. Already in production by Lockheed, this stealthy air-superiority fighter is to replace some of the older F-15s that are 30 years old.There is thought that Obama may halt production at the 183 plane count, but some are thinking he may just scale back the order from 381 (which is about half what the USAF originally wanted) to 243. The money quote from Obamasky is, “reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use,”. Hello…the reason we have the modern weapons and the best trained military in the world is SO THAT WE DON’T HAVE TO EVER USE THEM!!! BAD GUYS LOOK AT US AND DECIDE NOT TO MESS WITH US. Bad guys mess with the weak and disarmed. Folks, this is not a difficult concept. WARS ARE MORE EXPENSIVE IN LIVES AND MONEY THAN IS A SERIOUS NATIONAL DEFENSE!!

www.star-telegram.com/workandmoney/story/1225757.html

www.f-22raptor.com/news_view.php?nid=144&yr=2004

One of the perennial problems with the US Military and the civilian leadership when it comes to war planning, is that we always think about fighting the last war again. The rationale being used by Obamasky is that we are not in a Cold War anymore, we will be fighting insurgencies and terrorists, the world has grown past big WW2 style wars, so we don’t need the big, expensive weapons systems as much. DO YOU PEOPLE NOT REMEMBER THAT JUST LAST SUMMER THE SOVIETS INVADED GEORGIA? I said Soviets on purpose.

www.iht.com/articles/2009/03/17/europe/kremlin.php

In the above article the money quote is that Medvedev says “NATO is not halting its efforts to widen its military infrastructure near the borders of our country. All of this demands a quality modernization of our armed forces.” There are no NATO countries growing their defense budgets so what is he talking about? The Bush administration’s efforts to put missile defenses in Poland and Czech Rep. and the efforts at including Georgia an Ukraine in NATO. I would anticipate a war with Russia, aka Soviets, invading or striking Ukraine.

Notice that not only are the Russkies rearming, they are considering putting Bomber bases in our back yard, Venezuela and Cuba.

www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9776268a25e75ad5b44b4d87e8a32a02.4a1&show_article=1

Now let’s talk about the economics of all this. Obamasky increased the DoD budget by 4% for next year, but he did that by adding the War Operations budget to the DoD budget. Pres. Bush kept those separate. So while the DoD budget went up, money available for acquistions went down. Conversely, the Omnibus Spending Behemoth Bill that was just passed by Congress, increased the normal Government budget by 8%, twice the rate of increase for the Defense Dept. That shows where Obamasky’s priorities are- more bureaucraps, less fighter jets.

Think next about all the jobs lost by Union Labor(!) who tended to vote for Obamasky. You union guys are getting what you asked for! Think of all the job losses in an economy that is really in bad shape. But Obmasky bails out a lot of other industries and gives all kinds of pet projects money.

Don’t think I am only worried about Lockheed Martin losing money for the F-22 because I live in Fort Worth. The shipbuilders are going to lose out on some Navy destroyer projects and a couple of aircraft carriers as well as a boat load of submarines that are being cut. The next generation of Army armored vehicles are being cut (the M-1 Abrams and M-2 Bradley are both at the 30 year old mark.)

The botom line is that Pres. Obama is, in his first 60 days, significantly weakening Amerika to fit his image of what a socialist republic should be like. Russia and China are already noticing. This will lead to another war soon.

Equality 7-2521




Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

    About

    This blog exists to study the bi-vocational ministry, explore the Bible & Theology, and look at current events, history and other world religions through scripture, and have fun doing it!

    RSS

    Subscribe Via RSS

    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    • Subscribe in Google Reader
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • The latest comments to all posts in RSS

    Meta

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...